You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
What will be the result of the technological disruption on the global employment, in the next 10 years, on a capitalist bases??
What will be the influence of technological development on the global surplus value of capitalist production??
I love your whitepaper. You've clearly sunk a ton of time and effort into this and it shows. Your solution is elegant and if I had a steady check coming in, I would relax and focus on other ventures (making more contributions to ATOM.)
I don't intend to be spammy (not my intent), but if someone could please answer my question in this instance, I'd really appreciate it:
Your solution is elegant and if I had a steady check coming in, I would relax and focus on other ventures (making more contributions to ATOM.)
Yes! That is exactly the idea. Too many people assume the DUES will kill incentives, but I claim it will increase it, since the income tax is 0%, and the tailwind behind all technology startups would be higher.
peter Diamandis actually is favourable to the UBI idea.
I have been hearing more and more about the general idea of UBI in the mainstream chatterings, however people seem stuck in the idea that taxation is needed to fund it. The DUES is much better .
Thanks. The thing is, I am having trouble getting a fair hearing from Singularity U, despite my material being more advanced than most of theirs. I will get there, but at the moment they seem long on steep fees and light on new ideas..
Kartik, I appreciate the ideas you present and they make sense to me. I see the effects of technological deflation. However, there may be a flaw, Moore's law (which the ATOM theory relies on) is said to be coming to an absolute stop. what are your thoughts on this?
This is explained in detail throughout the publication. Plus, it is inaccurate to assume that Moore's Law is the entirely of technological progress, or even the entirety of computing. For example, parallel computing processes neural nets 20-50x faster than serial computing, even if the transistors are of the same size under Moore's Law.
You have observed how storage costs have fallen for decades. That is not Moore's Law. Hence it is incorrect to think of Moore's Law being the entirely of technological progress (or even a large part of it). It is not.
Hello ~
I've been lurking for a long time, watching your blog, and now your youtube channel.
Thank you for creating both information sites, very informative.
Two requests ~
1)Could you please create a bitchute channel as well? Bitchute will increase your reach, as well as being a backup in case Youtube goes down.
2)Please, please would you make a vid about this Zerohedge article:
I tried to understand it, but it was all gibberish to me, so...?
Just confused as to what it says or means, or is it just another handwaving bit of 'magic' that Phd's tend to do?
Thank you again for your insights, they help during these times of turmoil,
Linnea
What will be the result of the technological disruption on the global employment, in the next 10 years, on a capitalist bases??
What will be the influence of technological development on the global surplus value of capitalist production??
Posted by: VANDERBEKE ROLAND | December 10, 2016 at 09:42 AM
Vanderbeke Roland,
Read the entire publication, Chapters 1 through 14.
Posted by: Kartik Gada | December 10, 2016 at 04:12 PM
Hi Kartik,
Are you taking action to get this proposal in front of the Trump transition team?
James
Posted by: James Deus | December 12, 2016 at 02:31 AM
Hi James,
I would certainly like to, but don't have a direct contact there. Sending it cold would get lost within thousands of letters..
Posted by: Kartik Gada | December 12, 2016 at 07:12 AM
Hi KG,
I love your whitepaper. You've clearly sunk a ton of time and effort into this and it shows. Your solution is elegant and if I had a steady check coming in, I would relax and focus on other ventures (making more contributions to ATOM.)
I don't intend to be spammy (not my intent), but if someone could please answer my question in this instance, I'd really appreciate it:
http://atom.singularity2050.com/11-implementation-of-the-atom-age-for-individuals.html
Again, great stuff!
Posted by: computer_guy524 | December 15, 2016 at 06:34 AM
CG524,
Your solution is elegant and if I had a steady check coming in, I would relax and focus on other ventures (making more contributions to ATOM.)
Yes! That is exactly the idea. Too many people assume the DUES will kill incentives, but I claim it will increase it, since the income tax is 0%, and the tailwind behind all technology startups would be higher.
Posted by: Kartik Gada | December 15, 2016 at 08:47 AM
this book
https://www.amazon.com/Second-Machine-Age-Prosperity-Technologies/dp/0393350649
Is a good read, might be worth getting in touch with the authors? They are acceleration aware guys who share many of your ideas.
Posted by: Idiocraties | January 06, 2017 at 11:33 AM
I would also suggest Peter Diamandis, if you havent already contacted him. He is involved in everything to do with futurism and abundance. \
I'm trying to spread the idea amongst various libertarian minded people here in my country.
Posted by: Idiocraties | January 06, 2017 at 11:36 AM
Interesting thread about UBI at Instapundit today:
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/254437/#respond
Not a single mention about this concept over there- and remember these readers are a far above average slice of the internet.
Food for thought
Posted by: AL Villalobos | January 13, 2017 at 02:06 PM
http://peterdiamandis.tumblr.com/post/154384848183/universal-basic-income
peter Diamandis actually is favourable to the UBI idea.
I have been hearing more and more about the general idea of UBI in the mainstream chatterings, however people seem stuck in the idea that taxation is needed to fund it. The DUES is much better .
Posted by: Idiocraties | January 21, 2017 at 12:45 PM
Idiocrates,
Thanks. The thing is, I am having trouble getting a fair hearing from Singularity U, despite my material being more advanced than most of theirs. I will get there, but at the moment they seem long on steep fees and light on new ideas..
Posted by: Kartik Gada | January 21, 2017 at 04:42 PM
A less than ideal place to post/contactmay be here? They have a forum, and so may expose the ATOM to multiple eyeballs.
http://www.futuretimeline.net/contact.htm#.WIaEVlOLTIU
Uphill battle it would seem
Posted by: Idiocraties | January 23, 2017 at 02:32 PM
Kartik,
What's the latest with the video competition?
It seems to me that a better approach might be to employ your own advice to individuals (such as here: http://atom.singularity2050.com/11-implementation-of-the-atom-age-for-individuals.html ) and crowdfund/kickstart it yourself, no?
Posted by: James Deus | February 06, 2017 at 02:12 PM
James Deus,
It will be unveiled shortly.
Crowdfunding is one avenue I may pursue, but it is extremely difficult to generate money for a prize via crowdfunding.
Posted by: Kartik Gada | February 06, 2017 at 11:24 PM
Kartik, I appreciate the ideas you present and they make sense to me. I see the effects of technological deflation. However, there may be a flaw, Moore's law (which the ATOM theory relies on) is said to be coming to an absolute stop. what are your thoughts on this?
Posted by: RB | April 02, 2017 at 12:17 AM
RB,
This is explained in detail throughout the publication. Plus, it is inaccurate to assume that Moore's Law is the entirely of technological progress, or even the entirety of computing. For example, parallel computing processes neural nets 20-50x faster than serial computing, even if the transistors are of the same size under Moore's Law.
You have observed how storage costs have fallen for decades. That is not Moore's Law. Hence it is incorrect to think of Moore's Law being the entirely of technological progress (or even a large part of it). It is not.
Posted by: Kartik Gada | April 02, 2017 at 02:46 PM
Could you also publish it as an .epub file in addition the the .pdf?
Posted by: Dearth | September 21, 2020 at 11:20 AM
Hello Dearth,
There is an ebook format (and hardcopy) for sale on Amazon, but the v2.0 is not published there yet.
But this website and the .pdf format are free.
Posted by: Kartik Gada | September 21, 2020 at 12:25 PM
Hello ~
I've been lurking for a long time, watching your blog, and now your youtube channel.
Thank you for creating both information sites, very informative.
Two requests ~
1)Could you please create a bitchute channel as well? Bitchute will increase your reach, as well as being a backup in case Youtube goes down.
2)Please, please would you make a vid about this Zerohedge article:
https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/fed-prepares-go-direct-liquidity
I tried to understand it, but it was all gibberish to me, so...?
Just confused as to what it says or means, or is it just another handwaving bit of 'magic' that Phd's tend to do?
Thank you again for your insights, they help during these times of turmoil,
Linnea
Posted by: Linnea | May 23, 2021 at 03:01 PM
Hello Linnea,
Thanks for reading/watching.
I will look into Bitchute. I haven't familiarized myself with it yet.
I will do a video on what the Fed is doing.
Posted by: Kartik Gada | May 23, 2021 at 03:38 PM